For those readers who have great patience and can stand to wait for a book to appear in paperback form, they can enjoy a great read that is more affordable and easier to carry. There are even two sizes, the mass paperback (the smaller and uniform in size) and the trade paperback (the larger and not always the same size). Some authors, who are particularly popular in general or with a specific title, are published in both the mass and the trade. I much prefer the trade paperback (when I can wait and not demand the expediency of the hardback), as the print is larger and there is more white space between sentences. It's partially an age-related preference, but I actually like the feel of the larger books, too. My least favorite type of paperback in either mass or trade is the movie-cover paperback. I like my reading served up with a little less direction and more imagination. What steered me toward thinking about paperbacks is the article I read today on the origin of the paperback book. Originally called pocket books, for obvious reasons, the mass paperback still follows that form. Of course, the current trend of e-reading is analogous to the advent of the paperback, and it is mentioned in the article, too. I am including the article from Mental Floss Magazine so that others may also enjoy a little history lesson in reading.
Well, I must have good taste if you were going to blog it, too. LOL! Yeah, those mass market books just don't fit right. Thanks for the comment! I so appreciate it.ReplyDelete